Error rate by coding agent, April 2026
Error rate by coding agent, April 2026
Percentage of API calls that returned an error (non-200 status). Lower is better.

Roo Code is the most reliable at 2.5% error rate. Forge trails at 11.2%. Kilo Code sits at 10.0%.
How reliable are AI coding agents? In April 2026, Roo Code leads with a 2.5% error rate across 147K calls. Claude Code sits at 7.0% across 494K calls. Forge trails at 11.2% across 1.1K calls. Kilo Code shows 10.0% error rate across 23K calls.
Why it mattersError rates directly impact developer productivity. Roo Code's 2.5% error rate means fewer than 1 in 40 calls fails. The spread across agents points to structural differences in how agents construct and retry API requests.
Period
Apr 2026
Updated
May 16, 2026
ID
coding-agent-error-apr26
§ 01
Key findings
- 01Roo Code: 2.5% error rate. The most reliable coding agent by a significant margin.
- 02OpenCode: 3.1% error rate. Strong reliability despite rapid growth.
- 03Claude Code: 7.0% error rate. Acceptable but higher than Roo Code, possibly due to more aggressive retry patterns.
- 04Kilo Code: 10.0% error rate.
- 05Forge: 11.2% error rate. The highest among agents with sufficient sample size.
§ 02
Data
| Agent | Error rate(percent) |
|---|---|
| Aider | 0.90% |
| Roo Code | 2.50% |
| OpenCode | 3.10% |
| Zed | 3.70% |
| Cline | 4.90% |
| Claude Code | 7.00% |
| Kilo Code | 10.00% |
| Forge | 11.20% |
§ 03
Cite as
APA
Click to copy
BibTeX
Click to copy
ID: coding-agent-error-apr26·Updated May 16, 2026·Period Apr 2026