Requesty
Data/Reliability and ops

Error rate by coding agent, April 2026

Error rate by coding agent, April 2026

Percentage of API calls that returned an error (non-200 status). Lower is better.

Requesty
Roo Code is the most reliable at 2.5% error rate. Forge trails at 11.2%. Kilo Code sits at 10.0%.

How reliable are AI coding agents? In April 2026, Roo Code leads with a 2.5% error rate across 147K calls. Claude Code sits at 7.0% across 494K calls. Forge trails at 11.2% across 1.1K calls. Kilo Code shows 10.0% error rate across 23K calls.

Why it mattersError rates directly impact developer productivity. Roo Code's 2.5% error rate means fewer than 1 in 40 calls fails. The spread across agents points to structural differences in how agents construct and retry API requests.

Period
Apr 2026
Updated
May 16, 2026
ID
coding-agent-error-apr26
§ 01

Key findings

  • 01Roo Code: 2.5% error rate. The most reliable coding agent by a significant margin.
  • 02OpenCode: 3.1% error rate. Strong reliability despite rapid growth.
  • 03Claude Code: 7.0% error rate. Acceptable but higher than Roo Code, possibly due to more aggressive retry patterns.
  • 04Kilo Code: 10.0% error rate.
  • 05Forge: 11.2% error rate. The highest among agents with sufficient sample size.
§ 02

Data

AgentError rate(percent)
Aider0.90%
Roo Code2.50%
OpenCode3.10%
Zed3.70%
Cline4.90%
Claude Code7.00%
Kilo Code10.00%
Forge11.20%
§ 03

Cite as

APA
Click to copy
BibTeX
Click to copy
ID: coding-agent-error-apr26·Updated May 16, 2026·Period Apr 2026